Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-09 13:09:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD2AED8BEA920887A05750C5442690091EFBD1D5A61560EC922F50D62E563DF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Both studies cited in included note are look back analyses that would be incapable of effectively identifying a correlation. One of them self-discloses a significant conflict and the other throws out 17 controls for no good reason.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865926106789925236
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD2AED8BEA920887A05750C5442690091EFBD1D5A61560EC922F50D62E563DF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1733749772038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865926106789925236DD2AED8BEA920887A05750C5442690091EFBD1D5A61560EC922F50D62E563DF6