Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-09 01:46:31 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8EE6E2B5E5F263885BFEADEBFFE2202BD51CF3D23AEC2E6C33811A3EB5AFC0FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Both studies cited in included note are look back analyses that would be incapable of effectively identifying a correlation. One of them self-discloses a significant conflict and the other throws out 17 controls for no good reason.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865926106789925236
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8EE6E2B5E5F263885BFEADEBFFE2202BD51CF3D23AEC2E6C33811A3EB5AFC0FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1733708791466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18659261067899252368EE6E2B5E5F263885BFEADEBFFE2202BD51CF3D23AEC2E6C33811A3EB5AFC0FC