Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 06:03:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 766FBF0B7E3A5FA757ECE7843E5C1138A64F826BE19BA4F07C51E19027457745
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Both studies cited in included note are look back analyses that would be incapable of effectively identifying a correlation. One of them self-discloses a significant conflict and the other throws out 17 controls for no good reason.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865926106789925236
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 766FBF0B7E3A5FA757ECE7843E5C1138A64F826BE19BA4F07C51E19027457745
  • createdAtMillis - 1733810626163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865926106789925236766FBF0B7E3A5FA757ECE7843E5C1138A64F826BE19BA4F07C51E19027457745