Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-09 02:43:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 583458CAE55AC34E2BDBC0D6EB8BB3E37B2B1E6FACC72A25D649851090C56484
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Both studies cited in included note are look back analyses that would be incapable of effectively identifying a correlation. One of them self-discloses a significant conflict and the other throws out 17 controls for no good reason.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865926106789925236
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 583458CAE55AC34E2BDBC0D6EB8BB3E37B2B1E6FACC72A25D649851090C56484
  • createdAtMillis - 1733712227545
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865926106789925236583458CAE55AC34E2BDBC0D6EB8BB3E37B2B1E6FACC72A25D649851090C56484