Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-09 00:08:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Once again we find ourselves rating a CN as opinion. Keep it to the comments, stop abusing CN to have your opinion at the top of the tree. It's unethical and goes against your agreement with the CN program.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865716352495022306
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1733702881799
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865716352495022306FD70610C6F5160D5ACE665BB6F00E495572E87BE3B0F8DAA40C501CF0ED406ED