Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-08 10:05:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF4240DCD355C635638CEFF5421AB8AD5F1F077C403692AC48479C5C2DFA19A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN l’article, payant, fait état de débats. La jurisprudence date de 1985 et ne tient pas compte des lois organiques du Code de la sécurité sociale adoptées après. La spécialiste n’a pas tort, la possibilité que l’âge de départ relève du règlement est très peu probable. https://x.com/CarpentierUT1/status/1865083523742282095

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865371527958397367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF4240DCD355C635638CEFF5421AB8AD5F1F077C403692AC48479C5C2DFA19A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1733652340008
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865371527958397367BF4240DCD355C635638CEFF5421AB8AD5F1F077C403692AC48479C5C2DFA19A1