Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 20:39:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6365DE5CCF9E9AD413B3C387042314A5238CB65F51C11511957A17F38B7291E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN l’article, payant, fait état de débats. La jurisprudence date de 1985 et ne tient pas compte des lois organiques du Code de la sécurité sociale adoptées après. La spécialiste n’a pas tort, la possibilité que l’âge de départ relève du règlement est très peu probable. https://x.com/CarpentierUT1/status/1865083523742282095

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865371527958397367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6365DE5CCF9E9AD413B3C387042314A5238CB65F51C11511957A17F38B7291E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1733603962850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18653715279583973676365DE5CCF9E9AD413B3C387042314A5238CB65F51C11511957A17F38B7291E8