Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 16:19:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C2ACAA5FB33EE652DD2D712C1A1F51FC4E63138DFC04994360DA8B721FED492
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN l’article, payant, fait état de débats. La jurisprudence date de 1985 et ne tient pas compte des lois organiques du Code de la sécurité sociale adoptées après. La spécialiste n’a pas tort, la possibilité que l’âge de départ relève du règlement est très peu probable. https://x.com/CarpentierUT1/status/1865083523742282095

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865371527958397367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C2ACAA5FB33EE652DD2D712C1A1F51FC4E63138DFC04994360DA8B721FED492
  • createdAtMillis - 1733588368525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18653715279583973674C2ACAA5FB33EE652DD2D712C1A1F51FC4E63138DFC04994360DA8B721FED492