Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 04:40:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 543BA4A0094238594A8FF7D22EDAC45B5B83D969E74AFB311C0CDC5DF80B726C
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該サイトに六四天安門事件についての内容はなかったこと、「六四天安門」という言葉が「検索よけ」に使われていることなどから毎日新聞社の主張にはこの書き込みを最も合理的に説明できています。よってノートは不要です https://honichi.com/news/2019/10/02/chinesecensorship/ https://www.todaishimbun.org/frontierscience_kakikomi_20241207/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865210957531877530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 543BA4A0094238594A8FF7D22EDAC45B5B83D969E74AFB311C0CDC5DF80B726C
  • createdAtMillis - 1733546430189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865210957531877530543BA4A0094238594A8FF7D22EDAC45B5B83D969E74AFB311C0CDC5DF80B726C