Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 11:10:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4560E5A088CDFD7BDC6D29F57D016711BC8474D47E2BAA2B04F1E9448D81A008
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該サイトに六四天安門事件についての内容はなかったこと、「六四天安門」という言葉が「検索よけ」に使われていることなどから毎日新聞社の主張にはこの書き込みを最も合理的に説明できています。よってノートは不要です https://honichi.com/news/2019/10/02/chinesecensorship/ https://www.todaishimbun.org/frontierscience_kakikomi_20241207/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865210957531877530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4560E5A088CDFD7BDC6D29F57D016711BC8474D47E2BAA2B04F1E9448D81A008
  • createdAtMillis - 1733569848136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18652109575318775304560E5A088CDFD7BDC6D29F57D016711BC8474D47E2BAA2B04F1E9448D81A008