Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 22:50:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2006AEC8C6F063B0C344AF3B1280B73CE7A01CC8D45278491514921474D290FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該サイトに六四天安門事件についての内容はなかったこと、「六四天安門」という言葉が「検索よけ」に使われていることなどから毎日新聞社の主張にはこの書き込みを最も合理的に説明できています。よってノートは不要です https://honichi.com/news/2019/10/02/chinesecensorship/ https://www.todaishimbun.org/frontierscience_kakikomi_20241207/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865210957531877530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2006AEC8C6F063B0C344AF3B1280B73CE7A01CC8D45278491514921474D290FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1733611847002
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18652109575318775302006AEC8C6F063B0C344AF3B1280B73CE7A01CC8D45278491514921474D290FC