Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 19:28:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B23492FD0A8314501F50F5820E584E67561C8E017F56F15259954601635579BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es gibt kein Urteil, das untersagt den Correctiv Bericht weiter zu verbreiten. Trotz mehreren Prozessen dürfen die zentralen Erkenntnisse der Corrective Recherche bis heute unangefochten stehen bleiben. https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/neue-rechte/2024/01/10/geheimplan-remigration-vertreibung-afd-rechtsextreme-november-treffen/ https://www.wbs.legal/medienrecht/nach-treffen-von-rechten-in-potsdam-correctiv-gewinnt-gegen-vosgerau-vor-dem-olg-hamburg-75078/ https://correctiv.org/in-eigener-sache/2024/08/30/correctiv-erfolge-vor-gericht/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1865107267890172372
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B23492FD0A8314501F50F5820E584E67561C8E017F56F15259954601635579BE
createdAtMillis - 1733513331270
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1865107267890172372B23492FD0A8314501F50F5820E584E67561C8E017F56F15259954601635579BE