Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 22:01:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F20A570036B412FC9E4FC0183391154FC72A7EEC1EF2E4B6DA9CF8C5B51D5B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es gibt kein Urteil, das untersagt den Correctiv Bericht weiter zu verbreiten. Trotz mehreren Prozessen dürfen die zentralen Erkenntnisse der Corrective Recherche bis heute unangefochten stehen bleiben. https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/neue-rechte/2024/01/10/geheimplan-remigration-vertreibung-afd-rechtsextreme-november-treffen/ https://www.wbs.legal/medienrecht/nach-treffen-von-rechten-in-potsdam-correctiv-gewinnt-gegen-vosgerau-vor-dem-olg-hamburg-75078/ https://correctiv.org/in-eigener-sache/2024/08/30/correctiv-erfolge-vor-gericht/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1865107267890172372
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 98F20A570036B412FC9E4FC0183391154FC72A7EEC1EF2E4B6DA9CF8C5B51D5B
createdAtMillis - 1733522486813
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186510726789017237298F20A570036B412FC9E4FC0183391154FC72A7EEC1EF2E4B6DA9CF8C5B51D5B