Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 19:54:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C8CC1925E7301E32AD8A0BB4EC5029CCA6C74324F2F19AE46E1B30B1BA759ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le rapport en question n'est pas scientifique, il a été redirigé par un comité composé principalement d'élu républicain. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Oversight_and_Accountability

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865106328676634962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C8CC1925E7301E32AD8A0BB4EC5029CCA6C74324F2F19AE46E1B30B1BA759ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1733514891938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18651063286766349624C8CC1925E7301E32AD8A0BB4EC5029CCA6C74324F2F19AE46E1B30B1BA759ED