Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 20:50:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16679C532423CDCE31B4484A1BEF4ECDE5EA5392C134FDA5C22806419116AB51
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le rapport en question n'est pas scientifique, il a été redirigé par un comité composé principalement d'élu républicain. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Oversight_and_Accountability

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865106328676634962
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16679C532423CDCE31B4484A1BEF4ECDE5EA5392C134FDA5C22806419116AB51
  • createdAtMillis - 1733518249444
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186510632867663496216679C532423CDCE31B4484A1BEF4ECDE5EA5392C134FDA5C22806419116AB51