Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 16:53:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 298C22F2728A36522C3F23FAB4ACB0F60F0BB25DBAFEB832605C2F613D30235C
Participant Details

Original Note:

It seems we spend way too time correcting incorrect cns than we do on actual posts. Those who are unfamiliar with a subject would do everyone a favor by restraining themselves from commenting here. Very easy to read the web page and add the parameter. https://report.nih.gov/funding/categorical-spending#/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865073727865827699
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 298C22F2728A36522C3F23FAB4ACB0F60F0BB25DBAFEB832605C2F613D30235C
  • createdAtMillis - 1733504022657
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1865073727865827699298C22F2728A36522C3F23FAB4ACB0F60F0BB25DBAFEB832605C2F613D30235C