Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 14:47:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E75883A5F1B1C2577221C0D277C9AAB9AD8AE78EB2703002003EB676D73B8F06
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both the current explanations for NN are blatant abuses of CN. The first doesn't refute anything in the original post, which is factual, and the second is not familiar with the basic concept of administrative law. Caring Fig Duck especially should face a severe downgrade.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864985794798141861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E75883A5F1B1C2577221C0D277C9AAB9AD8AE78EB2703002003EB676D73B8F06
  • createdAtMillis - 1733496422877
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864985794798141861E75883A5F1B1C2577221C0D277C9AAB9AD8AE78EB2703002003EB676D73B8F06