Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 19:24:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9573D6D44529C3248663314D6C0E1855FEC59B9FC6A037013338A70EBB350EA9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both the current explanations for NN are blatant abuses of CN. The first doesn't refute anything in the original post, which is factual, and the second is not familiar with the basic concept of administrative law. Caring Fig Duck especially should face a severe downgrade.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864985794798141861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9573D6D44529C3248663314D6C0E1855FEC59B9FC6A037013338A70EBB350EA9
  • createdAtMillis - 1733513095236
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18649857947981418619573D6D44529C3248663314D6C0E1855FEC59B9FC6A037013338A70EBB350EA9