Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 07:16:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both the current explanations for NN are blatant abuses of CN. The first doesn't refute anything in the original post, which is factual, and the second is not familiar with the basic concept of administrative law. Caring Fig Duck especially should face a severe downgrade.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864985794798141861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2
  • createdAtMillis - 1733555791989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18649857947981418610989517449DE5FE25A10162CA24DFEA1D3CA29F65C0919A523DB814E0C367EF2