Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 18:42:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF058722F9E5637AB94C65FD368A52124DBF9A5D0D1DFF397C9AC7DEE51B6D74
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - post is factually correct. CN suggesting that random websites are more accurate than the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which manages census and population data for the UK is either laughably misinformed or being purposefully disingenuous.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864984135854588279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF058722F9E5637AB94C65FD368A52124DBF9A5D0D1DFF397C9AC7DEE51B6D74
  • createdAtMillis - 1733510531492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864984135854588279EF058722F9E5637AB94C65FD368A52124DBF9A5D0D1DFF397C9AC7DEE51B6D74