Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 13:08:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC305F099885A0BE84C197F49DC728CACFA0D57543D05F11C83D96D930F77809
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - post is factually correct. CN suggesting that random websites are more accurate than the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which manages census and population data for the UK is either laughably misinformed or being purposefully disingenuous.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864984135854588279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC305F099885A0BE84C197F49DC728CACFA0D57543D05F11C83D96D930F77809
  • createdAtMillis - 1733490500553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864984135854588279EC305F099885A0BE84C197F49DC728CACFA0D57543D05F11C83D96D930F77809