Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 10:50:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A73444A1B6D8A4FB2663C0F0F1E34330CAC1D0CCAE8FA7FF181661A82FBF118A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - post is factually correct. CN suggesting that random websites are more accurate than the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which manages census and population data for the UK is either laughably misinformed or being purposefully disingenuous.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864984135854588279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A73444A1B6D8A4FB2663C0F0F1E34330CAC1D0CCAE8FA7FF181661A82FBF118A
  • createdAtMillis - 1733568627313
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864984135854588279A73444A1B6D8A4FB2663C0F0F1E34330CAC1D0CCAE8FA7FF181661A82FBF118A