Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 23:44:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A64D162B3CCA382A580852BEAA4F165E82D9504C4F27DEE5663CB221CB3F302F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - post is factually correct. CN suggesting that random websites are more accurate than the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which manages census and population data for the UK is either laughably misinformed or being purposefully disingenuous.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864984135854588279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A64D162B3CCA382A580852BEAA4F165E82D9504C4F27DEE5663CB221CB3F302F
  • createdAtMillis - 1733528667864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864984135854588279A64D162B3CCA382A580852BEAA4F165E82D9504C4F27DEE5663CB221CB3F302F