Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 12:02:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A71B46DAFC36A1BAF712332D5E08558DAC0033CABFFA5DEC363806DE863E297
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - post is factually correct. CN suggesting that random websites are more accurate than the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which manages census and population data for the UK is either laughably misinformed or being purposefully disingenuous.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864984135854588279
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A71B46DAFC36A1BAF712332D5E08558DAC0033CABFFA5DEC363806DE863E297
  • createdAtMillis - 1733486566390
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18649841358545882795A71B46DAFC36A1BAF712332D5E08558DAC0033CABFFA5DEC363806DE863E297