Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 07:39:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE83E371101978BB0F011DDD44C33E1B0B9E799BAFCC32A2417514485AE77FAB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The report doesn’t leave the ICJ jurisprudence it says that you can potentially read the jurisprudence incredibly narrowly to avoid Israel’s responsibility or, as Amnesty have, you can read it more broadly. It’s a different interpretation of the law but not a contradictory one https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MDE1586682024ENGLISH.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864729692454162833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE83E371101978BB0F011DDD44C33E1B0B9E799BAFCC32A2417514485AE77FAB
  • createdAtMillis - 1733470783007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864729692454162833BE83E371101978BB0F011DDD44C33E1B0B9E799BAFCC32A2417514485AE77FAB