Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 09:43:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE1A5998E78C9D4DA5AF998FC0E893EC5755EC0DFB8F3880038AC9564273D773
Participant Details

Original Note:

The report doesn’t leave the ICJ jurisprudence it says that you can potentially read the jurisprudence incredibly narrowly to avoid Israel’s responsibility or, as Amnesty have, you can read it more broadly. It’s a different interpretation of the law but not a contradictory one https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MDE1586682024ENGLISH.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864729692454162833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE1A5998E78C9D4DA5AF998FC0E893EC5755EC0DFB8F3880038AC9564273D773
  • createdAtMillis - 1733564624761
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864729692454162833BE1A5998E78C9D4DA5AF998FC0E893EC5755EC0DFB8F3880038AC9564273D773