Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-06 06:15:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A17784840AA14DC541DDA39C96A6255DA677B5F407870DBE6E1F0F5399C4366
Participant Details

Original Note:

The report doesn’t leave the ICJ jurisprudence it says that you can potentially read the jurisprudence incredibly narrowly to avoid Israel’s responsibility or, as Amnesty have, you can read it more broadly. It’s a different interpretation of the law but not a contradictory one https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MDE1586682024ENGLISH.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864729692454162833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A17784840AA14DC541DDA39C96A6255DA677B5F407870DBE6E1F0F5399C4366
  • createdAtMillis - 1733465716463
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18647296924541628335A17784840AA14DC541DDA39C96A6255DA677B5F407870DBE6E1F0F5399C4366