Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-05 21:21:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 424E17642AE3D750FD10435AA8CADD24BC017F66EE00D99F62B9BBD22AE092EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The report doesn’t leave the ICJ jurisprudence it says that you can potentially read the jurisprudence incredibly narrowly to avoid Israel’s responsibility or, as Amnesty have, you can read it more broadly. It’s a different interpretation of the law but not a contradictory one https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/MDE1586682024ENGLISH.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864729692454162833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 424E17642AE3D750FD10435AA8CADD24BC017F66EE00D99F62B9BBD22AE092EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1733433718808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864729692454162833424E17642AE3D750FD10435AA8CADD24BC017F66EE00D99F62B9BBD22AE092EA