Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-05 14:09:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D6B75FFB9510A3AADFD59E6E237D0D726D2A9ACFF26F550F3274F1020373C18
Participant Details

Original Note:

U.S. v. Skrmetti, the case this tweet is referring to, only brings into question bans on gender-affirming care for minors. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-set-hear-major-transgender-rights-case-2024-12-04/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864429301741048220
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D6B75FFB9510A3AADFD59E6E237D0D726D2A9ACFF26F550F3274F1020373C18
  • createdAtMillis - 1733407794180
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18644293017410482203D6B75FFB9510A3AADFD59E6E237D0D726D2A9ACFF26F550F3274F1020373C18