Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-05 05:05:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD9A0A87D03087D9B61813E205265FA7D02A3770BA38D2C3C875EDF22AA26FE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es sensacionalista, dando la impresión de que ha ocurrido algo inédito porque "la jueza no concreta indicios ni delitos", cuando lo normal es que no lo haga hasta finalizar la instrucción. Lo atípico y poco frecuente en este caso es más bien el recurso de la fiscalía https://x.com/iuristoteles/status/1864245596791492761

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864304246273003809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD9A0A87D03087D9B61813E205265FA7D02A3770BA38D2C3C875EDF22AA26FE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1733375140095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864304246273003809FD9A0A87D03087D9B61813E205265FA7D02A3770BA38D2C3C875EDF22AA26FE7