Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-05 06:48:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A482956049F2C6A6DB928BDE7F5E5E040BA8F5339C33BEDB63D14E486B3EF570
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es sensacionalista, dando la impresión de que ha ocurrido algo inédito porque "la jueza no concreta indicios ni delitos", cuando lo normal es que no lo haga hasta finalizar la instrucción. Lo atípico y poco frecuente en este caso es más bien el recurso de la fiscalía https://x.com/iuristoteles/status/1864245596791492761

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864304246273003809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A482956049F2C6A6DB928BDE7F5E5E040BA8F5339C33BEDB63D14E486B3EF570
  • createdAtMillis - 1733381293937
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1864304246273003809A482956049F2C6A6DB928BDE7F5E5E040BA8F5339C33BEDB63D14E486B3EF570