Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-04 14:32:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C1686EF458ADAD912F70E066FC4DF06C6AF82A9422757F89694297A0369DABB
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es sensacionalista, dando la impresión de que ha ocurrido algo inédito porque "la jueza no concreta indicios ni delitos", cuando lo normal es que no lo haga hasta finalizar la instrucción. Lo atípico y poco frecuente en este caso es más bien el recurso de la fiscalía https://x.com/iuristoteles/status/1864245596791492761

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864304246273003809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C1686EF458ADAD912F70E066FC4DF06C6AF82A9422757F89694297A0369DABB
  • createdAtMillis - 1733322726965
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18643042462730038099C1686EF458ADAD912F70E066FC4DF06C6AF82A9422757F89694297A0369DABB