Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-04 15:58:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10FAB9B553518A9C6FFF9ACB0373C54E1E985EDAFFB8BA79AFE01136B1B18727
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Behauptungen zu einer „SV40-Kontamination“ basieren auf Erkenntnissen aus einem Preprint, der keinem Peer-Review-Verfahren unterzogen wurde. Auf der Website Publichealthpolicyjournal werden solche Prints veröffentlicht die keinen unabhängigen Prüfungen standgehalten haben. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/are-covid-19-mrna-shots-adulterated-contaminated-off-market/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864284345936097614
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10FAB9B553518A9C6FFF9ACB0373C54E1E985EDAFFB8BA79AFE01136B1B18727
  • createdAtMillis - 1733327927627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 186428434593609761410FAB9B553518A9C6FFF9ACB0373C54E1E985EDAFFB8BA79AFE01136B1B18727