Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-04 14:30:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AABF0AD5143E50B2E42DA173EDA6A80062450AD5A4904F02053E650E984E5E4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Behauptungen zu einer „SV40-Kontamination“ basieren auf Erkenntnissen aus einem Preprint, der keinem Peer-Review-Verfahren unterzogen wurde. Auf der Website Publichealthpolicyjournal werden solche Prints veröffentlicht die keinen unabhängigen Prüfungen standgehalten haben. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/are-covid-19-mrna-shots-adulterated-contaminated-off-market/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864271295073980562
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AABF0AD5143E50B2E42DA173EDA6A80062450AD5A4904F02053E650E984E5E4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1733322649995
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864271295073980562AABF0AD5143E50B2E42DA173EDA6A80062450AD5A4904F02053E650E984E5E4F