Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-05 17:58:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D78A8E747BEFE62CC286EF1C51C3FC84E88F6CD75ABF9E4DF7FEB8F95D2DCD69
Participant Details

Original Note:

The information reported makes no distinction between combatants and non combatants. It’s misleading and not accurate. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/gaza-fatality-data-has-become-completely-unreliable

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864126416780140906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D78A8E747BEFE62CC286EF1C51C3FC84E88F6CD75ABF9E4DF7FEB8F95D2DCD69
  • createdAtMillis - 1733421494073
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1864126416780140906D78A8E747BEFE62CC286EF1C51C3FC84E88F6CD75ABF9E4DF7FEB8F95D2DCD69