Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 21:20:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5B0855134A7AF2EDDCE4C481D573029775409FF81CDFDD4A33411447559B618
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le tweet est trompeur : il qualifie de "non-sujet" un cas réel, bien que rare, de dépense AME pour recoller les oreilles, avec un montant confirmé de 11.660€. Source: https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/des-clandestins-en-france-pour-se-faire-recoller-les-oreilles-grace-a-lame-comment-le-rn-a-fait-dun-non-sujet-un-fantasme-20241203_INZ7BB2WZNER5J77PGPQMGZELU

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864055560443683131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5B0855134A7AF2EDDCE4C481D573029775409FF81CDFDD4A33411447559B618
  • createdAtMillis - 1733260821301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864055560443683131A5B0855134A7AF2EDDCE4C481D573029775409FF81CDFDD4A33411447559B618