Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 22:20:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F87DDC7288EB5E4D74C9333C916D9D7FB8941182F04B6F51DBC6D11D1D464E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le tweet est trompeur : il qualifie de "non-sujet" un cas réel, bien que rare, de dépense AME pour recoller les oreilles, avec un montant confirmé de 11.660€. Source: https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/des-clandestins-en-france-pour-se-faire-recoller-les-oreilles-grace-a-lame-comment-le-rn-a-fait-dun-non-sujet-un-fantasme-20241203_INZ7BB2WZNER5J77PGPQMGZELU

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864055560443683131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F87DDC7288EB5E4D74C9333C916D9D7FB8941182F04B6F51DBC6D11D1D464E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1733264404077
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18640555604436831310F87DDC7288EB5E4D74C9333C916D9D7FB8941182F04B6F51DBC6D11D1D464E6