Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 19:39:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAE43831923A4F89A9C632537F29DB92C473C1BA50C8B60B4092B8D27A26C3B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleidend. BBB vroeg om een onafhankelijk onderzoek naar de eenzijdige biased berichtgeving bij de NPO. Dat is iets heel anders dan wat BN er hierboven als feit poneert. https://debatdirect.tweedekamer.nl/2024-12-02/overig/groen-van-prinstererzaal/media-10-00/onderwerp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863834538188640425
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAE43831923A4F89A9C632537F29DB92C473C1BA50C8B60B4092B8D27A26C3B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1733254749129
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1863834538188640425DAE43831923A4F89A9C632537F29DB92C473C1BA50C8B60B4092B8D27A26C3B9