Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 03:05:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11073B02FDCAA136EC9A75D019F34E7ADA003DE2BCBDD8A9D9BB8522CE256183
Participant Details

Original Note:

誤解を招きかねない見出しをしてるので補足すると本記事内に < アンケートは4回目で、9月1~30日、今年5月以降のトラブルについて保険医1002人に調査。66人(機関)が回答した。 と書いてあるように9割以上の医師が回答してない事に注意が必要です。 https://mainichi.jp/articles/20241202/k00/00m/040/016000c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863556672087880100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11073B02FDCAA136EC9A75D019F34E7ADA003DE2BCBDD8A9D9BB8522CE256183
  • createdAtMillis - 1733195130186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186355667208788010011073B02FDCAA136EC9A75D019F34E7ADA003DE2BCBDD8A9D9BB8522CE256183