Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-02 08:23:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC28B79ACBE1EAB7A2BEC6D6F5B963557D1C20838916F8733E4DE595050B3381
Participant Details

Original Note:

低用量ピルの承認が遅れた要因として、ウーマンリブ運動の女性らがピル解禁に反対したことも重要です。 https://kurimori2007.seesaa.net/article/503575991.html https://meiji.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4701/files/shinrishakaigaku_14_43.pdf ピルの使用は、歴史的に、フェミニストらの間でも賛否ある事だったのです。女性差別とただちに結びつけるのは、議論の余地があります。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863478851311173656
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC28B79ACBE1EAB7A2BEC6D6F5B963557D1C20838916F8733E4DE595050B3381
  • createdAtMillis - 1733127814925
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1863478851311173656CC28B79ACBE1EAB7A2BEC6D6F5B963557D1C20838916F8733E4DE595050B3381