Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-02 02:52:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB01FD92A9B7446CBDFC7E59C91F9E8D436F64D6F5B37B90D23F88D484D159A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the claim (per abstract) is that the literature hints at prejudices and thereby makes a case for prejudice itself, having formed that literature. OP made an interpretation that is technically correct, more interpretations could be made, but should be left to the comments. https://x.com/DrAllyLouks/status/1862454376645677222

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863261856904958176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB01FD92A9B7446CBDFC7E59C91F9E8D436F64D6F5B37B90D23F88D484D159A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1733107945204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1863261856904958176BB01FD92A9B7446CBDFC7E59C91F9E8D436F64D6F5B37B90D23F88D484D159A5