Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-01 20:06:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6726872C932D3BBE2F1798736E8DB1CE2A936E610A7B85B52525459A3DF8CD4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the claim (per abstract) is that the literature hints at prejudices and thereby makes a case for prejudice itself, having formed that literature. OP made an interpretation that is technically correct, more interpretations could be made, but should be left to the comments. https://x.com/DrAllyLouks/status/1862454376645677222

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863261856904958176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B6726872C932D3BBE2F1798736E8DB1CE2A936E610A7B85B52525459A3DF8CD4
  • createdAtMillis - 1733083618059
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1863261856904958176B6726872C932D3BBE2F1798736E8DB1CE2A936E610A7B85B52525459A3DF8CD4