Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-01 15:54:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dans un premier temps la cour d'appel de Versailles l'avait relaxé du délit de diffamation mais avait retenu le délit d'injure, Ensuite la Chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation a cassé le jugement sans renvoi. Maitre Eolas est donc déjà relaxé intégralement. https://www.lexbase.fr/article-juridique/49497799-jurisprudence-la-liberte-dexpression-sur-un-sujet-dinteret-general-sur-twitter#:~:text=R%C3%A9sum%C3%A9%20%3A%20La%20Chambre%20criminelle%20de,de%20la%20libert%C3%A9%20d'expression

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863224828737499354
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527
  • createdAtMillis - 1733068481646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18632248287374993545F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527