Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-01 22:01:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C95963F78CBFD59EFD6B2BB7B8B067A71D7C780A88D33E65E94AE08EC1FF9123
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ein Vergleich von Flächenbedarf durch Windräder vs. Einfamilienhäuser ist irreführend, weil beide Bauwerke in keinem funktionalen Zusammenhang stehen. Vergleichen müsste man Einfamilienhäuser vs. andere Wohnhäuser und Windräder vs. andere Formen der Energiegewinnung z.B. Kohle: https://www.nabu.de/umwelt-und-ressourcen/energie/fossile-energien/stein-und-braunkohle/20803.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863158182681461110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C95963F78CBFD59EFD6B2BB7B8B067A71D7C780A88D33E65E94AE08EC1FF9123
  • createdAtMillis - 1733090479684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1863158182681461110C95963F78CBFD59EFD6B2BB7B8B067A71D7C780A88D33E65E94AE08EC1FF9123