Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-02 06:00:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F6074E440936D285D250AACAD6DDB0E87D09516A2FF5944D5DCA4CE63AEFA7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ein Vergleich von Flächenbedarf durch Windräder vs. Einfamilienhäuser ist irreführend, weil beide Bauwerke in keinem funktionalen Zusammenhang stehen. Vergleichen müsste man Einfamilienhäuser vs. andere Wohnhäuser und Windräder vs. andere Formen der Energiegewinnung z.B. Kohle: https://www.nabu.de/umwelt-und-ressourcen/energie/fossile-energien/stein-und-braunkohle/20803.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1863158182681461110
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4F6074E440936D285D250AACAD6DDB0E87D09516A2FF5944D5DCA4CE63AEFA7E
createdAtMillis - 1733119227019
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18631581826814611104F6074E440936D285D250AACAD6DDB0E87D09516A2FF5944D5DCA4CE63AEFA7E