Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-01 11:35:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A2F43992DD8D96987B3F6BF9F1A54BA7B902620EC079CADEAF5738D6DAD0019
Participant Details

Original Note:

誤解を生む可能性があるため情報を補足します。 記事本文中にかかれている通り、記事で取り上げられた出来事は1995年のものです。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20241201-CUP62GJMVNGF5PFIO7G3Q75XDQ/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863155193011114401
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A2F43992DD8D96987B3F6BF9F1A54BA7B902620EC079CADEAF5738D6DAD0019
  • createdAtMillis - 1733052926779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18631551930111144016A2F43992DD8D96987B3F6BF9F1A54BA7B902620EC079CADEAF5738D6DAD0019