Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-30 00:29:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The PN cites marbury v. Madison, which established judicial review. If you want to argue if that's relevant, you can do it in the comments, but you're going to be embarrassed, especially with loper bright having just destroyed Chevron deference. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862510671776063671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
  • createdAtMillis - 1732926553901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186251067177606367104E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945