Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-01 20:53:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80EC215D6B0F3EB42A62C5E74D0CBC11037D27F306A39CEEF9EAA30C45504DF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Laut BGH hat Dettmar sich "zahlreiche Gehörsverstöße zuschulde" kommen lassen & "in elementarer Weise" gegen Verfahrensvorschriften verstoßen. Zudem hat er Sachverständige nach seiner privaten Rechtsauffassung ausgewählt & heimlich über seine private Mail-Adresse kontaktiert. https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2024/2024222.html?nn=10690868

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1862440458389266561
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 80EC215D6B0F3EB42A62C5E74D0CBC11037D27F306A39CEEF9EAA30C45504DF3
createdAtMillis - 1733086388293
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 186244045838926656180EC215D6B0F3EB42A62C5E74D0CBC11037D27F306A39CEEF9EAA30C45504DF3