Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-29 01:29:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32CD3F93CF3F36A67F9F9B595BF773F86E52D2CE597511F33468410E34B3B601
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular indica que el trabajador ha sido apartado por “un comentario violento A un menor de edad”. El titular es engañoso ya que como se puede leer en la noticia el comentario fue SOBRE un menor de edad, pero no A el niño, ya que el implicado no se dirigió al menor. https://www.ideal.es/granada/apartan-trabajador-csic-granada-comentario-violento-menor-20241127173939-nt_amp.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1862233676676751554
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 32CD3F93CF3F36A67F9F9B595BF773F86E52D2CE597511F33468410E34B3B601
createdAtMillis - 1732843778425
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186223367667675155432CD3F93CF3F36A67F9F9B595BF773F86E52D2CE597511F33468410E34B3B601