Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 20:32:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33C354252CA4E4971CC1128220C3837D78DDB1E3E46285937D8BF5AFD1454798
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN - calling someone a “rapist” is hardly “an opinion” — more so even if that someone was vindicated in the court of law. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/77/c0/f7/77c0f748df0b495aad728c6621dab4d7.jpg https://youtu.be/ZxNDb2PVcoM?feature=shared

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862220756425613346
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33C354252CA4E4971CC1128220C3837D78DDB1E3E46285937D8BF5AFD1454798
  • createdAtMillis - 1732825968005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186222075642561334633C354252CA4E4971CC1128220C3837D78DDB1E3E46285937D8BF5AFD1454798